unhintergehbar (uncircumventable) conditions of our argumentative discourses. This chapter focuses on another of these controversial assertions, the consensus theory of truth, which has also been subject to criticism. In well-known attempts, both Wellmer and Putnam regard transcendental pragmatics as a kind of anti-realism, although my own opinion is that there is limited validity to their criticisms. However, rather than directly responding to them, I leverage these criticisms for the purpose of clarifying the transcendental-pragmatic notion of truth and illustrating its relevance to ultimate grounding, with the end result that these criticisms will become less compelling." /> Consequences of the transcendental-pragmatic consensus theory of truth - Yoshime Michihito | sdvig press

Consequences of the transcendental-pragmatic consensus theory of truth

Michihito Yoshime

pp. 263-283


This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.

Not implemented yet !