2011) the division between Lifeworld and the “world of science“, a division that is indeed fundamental for Husserl’s overall position. Hence, if successful, Ihde’s argument effectively undermines Husserl’s late philosophy of science. The aim of this paper is to show that Ihde’s criticism does not stand up to closer historical or philosophical scrutiny." /> Mechanics lost - Wiltsche Harald | sdvig press

Mechanics lost

Husserl's Galileo and Ihde's telescope

Harald Wiltsche

pp. 149-173

Full Text
Download
Other Editions

Text

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.

Not implemented yet !