Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 875–881, (2008) that measures children's protest behaviour when a pre-established constitutive rule has been violated. Children seem to protest when they realize that rule violations are not allowed or should not have happened. We point out that there is more than one possible explanation for children's reactions in these studies. They could be due to (1) disobeying an authority, (2) an inability to follow a rule, or (3) the violation of an empirical expectation due to the mismatch between statement and action. We thus question whether it would still count as an indicator for normative understanding if children responded to aspects of the game other than the violation of a constitutive rule and conclude that the protesting behavior, when taken in isolation, does not suffice as evidence for normative understanding." /> Young children's protest - Brandl Johannes L; Esken Frank; Priewasser Beate; Rafetseder Eva | sdvig press

Young children's protest

what it can (not) tell us about early normative understanding

Johannes L Brandl, Frank Esken, Beate Priewasser, Eva Rafetseder

pp. 719-740


This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.

Not implemented yet !