Kehre, in at least two ways. First, phenomenology was necessary: the pathway to "thought" had to go through it, and therefore phenomenology can never have been utterly devoid of "thought" in the first place. In the second place, phenomenology was not just one approach that could be cast aside later in favour of a new one called "thought" — instead, it left its mark permanently on "thought." Now I would like to explore the problem of the Kehre,with a focus more on the first point, the way in which "thought" may make its presence felt within phenomenology." /> Through phenomenology to concealment - Nicholson Graeme | sdvig press