2 This inconsistency does not arise in Edmund Husserl's analysis of essential (de jure logical) structures, as contrasted to empirical (de facto, psychological) structures. Yet Husserl's analysis is motivated by his own critique of induction and psychologism.³ Therefore, after giving a brief sketch of Popper's solution and the inconsistency which it engenders, Part II presents Husserl's solution—which requires an epistemological, rather than ontological, pluralism." /> A phenomenological exploration of Popper's "World 3" - Reeder Harry P; Langsdorf Lenore | sdvig press