states, such as Japan, and other social groups. At the same time, we point out that Otaka's work faces a dilemma. On the one hand, if he sticks to the project of constitutive analysis, his account of the actuality of social groups is implausible, because it relies on the problematic idea that we can have supersensible intuition of those groups. On the other hand, if he removes the implausible portion of his analysis, it would make his position non-phenomenological according to his own Husserlian standards. This dilemma, we further argue, could have been avoided, if he adopts an alternative, but still Husserlian scheme of constitutive analysis." /> The actuality of states and other social groups - Uemura Genki; Yaegashi Toru | sdvig press